DECISIONS, DECISIONS….Question: Which is more annoying? (a) Lefter-than-thou liberals who are under the impression that it’s somehow either immoral or impolite to make money or (b) hacker-than-thou conservatives who worship 24/7 at the altar of making of money except when the moneymaker in question happens to be a Democratic presidential candidate and thus presents a chance to score some political points? It’s a tough choice.
What do you say?
5 responses so far ↓
dalben // May 23, 2007 at 3:51 pm
The fact that we have only these two choices (or three if you choose something from the homogenous ‘middle’
these days, it seems, is the really sucky thing.
I say the left is more annoying, the right more maddening.
James Fryer // May 23, 2007 at 4:22 pm
That’s like asking if I would rather be run over by a Touareg or a Cayenne. Yeah, they look different, but under the hood they are the same. And either way, I’m being run over.
If I insulted any Touareg or a Cayenne owners, good. The world needs overpriced, over-engineered imported Stupid Useless Vehicles even less then it needs utra lefties or wacko righties.
James Fryer // May 23, 2007 at 4:23 pm
…that should be ‘ultra’.
joyfarm6 // May 23, 2007 at 7:51 pm
I can imagine an “a” quite clearly, and even a “b” to the point up to the altar, but how does a Democrat presidential candidate fit into the picture? It would seem the candidate (isn’t that word and oxymoronic word for the person, “candid”?) is deserving of ridicule by dissing people that make money, when he made his by hook or crook. (One trial lawyer comes to mind).
BTW people are generally hypocrites by nature, lots of inconsistencies between ideals and actions.
Brian Purkiss // May 24, 2007 at 4:00 pm
You leave out options for those who do not fall in those two catagories…
Leave a Comment